Developers

Linked to the sioc-dev mailing list on Google Groups.

SIOC-Dev mailing list stats

Hi All,

The SIOC community is active on this mailing list and #sioc in IRC,
but still it is larger than just those who write software and
participate in discussions. So we thought you may be interested in
some stats about the list.

SIOC-Dev currently has 97 participants.
It will be 2 years old in August 2007.
The most active month so far was July 2006 with 74 messages.

Most active participants of all time:
162 Uldis Bojars
66 John Breslin
51 Alex Passant
39 Frederick Giasson
27 [GNU]
20 Kingsley Idehen
19 Axel Polleres
17 Richard Cyganiak
16 Wikier
14 Danny Ayers

eHealth Ontology Project on Google Groups

The recently launched eHealth Ontology Project (http://
www.ehealthserver.com/ontology/) is presenting a new service and in
special a news alert/headline spreading tool established in the frames
of the well known Google Groups interface. You are kindly invited to
join this group in order to receive alerts/headlines when a new
eHealth Ontology related information has been published on our home
page.

The mentioned service is free of charge and has been implemented in
order to keep our visitors informed about the core eHealth Ontology
activities and achievements!

For more information and in special for registration, please visit:

eHealth Ontology Project Latest Contributions

Infectious Disease: A Challenge for Biomedical Informatics
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York
Speakers: Michael Ashburner, Vance Fowler, Steven Gordon, Ronald
Veazey
September 21, 2007
In association with a two day Workshop on Infectious Disease Ontology
September 19 - 20, 2007
Workshop Application deadline: June 15, 2007
Read more...
http://www.ehealthserver.com/ontology/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=26&Itemid=1

Classes versus Individuals: Fundamental Design Issues for Ontologies
on the Biomedical Semantic Web
We can distinguish two general strategies for knowledge representation

eHealth Ontology Project

Dear Colleagues,

for me is a great honour to present you the eHealth Ontology Project
accessible at http://www.ehealthserver.com/ontology

It is at the very beginning stage, nevertheless so far it contains
some contributions and resources reflecting the eHealth Ontology area.
One of the main goals of the eHealth Ontology Project is to promote
the eHealth Ontology achievements and realisations.

In this context you are kindly invited for contributions. More then
that, your feedbacks, suggestions and comments would represent a great
value in developing our modest, but very ambitious initiative.

Twitter

A few days ago, Tom Morris was discussing an RDFizer of twitter.com data
he'd created:
http://chatlogs.planetrdf.com/swig/2007-05-04.html

http://tools.opiumfield.com/twitter/captsolo/rdf

-----------------
Keith Alexander
http://semwebdev.keithalexander.co.uk/blog/

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SIOC-Dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to sioc-dev@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sioc-dev-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sioc-dev?hl=en

Defining forum tree structure in SIOC

Hello,

I am experimenting with implementing SIOC on one of my websites. I've
already got the content, reactions and user profiles working.

I have one problem with the forum though, it is structured like a
tree, and I don't seem to be able to represent that structure with
SIOC.

The validator complains that the element Forum has multiple object
node elements.

Is it wrong for me to think that a sioc:Forum can be the parent of
more than one sioc:Forum? I've tried various approaches with
sioc:Container, sioc:Forum and sioc:parent_of and sioc:has_parent but
I keep getting a similar error.

Fwd: SFI Funded PhD & MSc opportunity in UCD

Hi All,

Information on 1 PhD & 1 MSc scholarship opportunity in UCD (Dublin,
Ireland) on OJAX++: A Next-Generation Collaborative Research Tool.

SIOC can play an important role in linking these different information
sources together. It is not directly mentioned in the document though
(unlike AJAX). It probably means we have to work more on promoting SIOC and
showing how to use it. :-)

Hope that someone in the SIOC community finds this information useful. And
maybe get to work on what you've wanted to do for a long time. Please find
more information below and in the attached Word document. Feel free to

Employing SIOC for Learning purposes (harvesting Learning Objects Metadata)

Some time ago, John informed you about my post where I described how
we use SIOC for IKHarvester (Informal Knowledge Harevster).

To get the general idea of how IKHarvester is planned to work (already
works as a prototype system), read my post: http://dobrzanski.net/2007/04/13/ikharvester/

In short, it harvests metadata for online resources which can be
learning material pieces and stores it in informal knowledge
repository (we find blog posts a great source of informal knowledge).
By using Web Services, client applications can retrieve this metadata
or the content of a specific resource. For IKHarvester at first point

Experiences with SIOC data

Hello there.

As Eyal Oren has announced on this list a few days ago, we developed a
SIOC explorer web application, which usually can be found at:
http://www.activerdf.org/sioc/

The new version of the SIOC explorer, allows you to see all posts in
the database from all forums for one day, week or month. You can
browse all posts written by one author.
If more then one forum in the database use topics with the same label,
then you can also view all posts with that topic label.

The SIOC explorer has been submitted to the Semantic Web scripting
challenge,
(http://www.semanticscripting.org/SFSW2007/)

Using tags for POWDER content labels

Hi all!

Sorry for the cross-posting, but this is a topic that I think is in the
intersection between POWDER, SIOC and SKOS, thus I would like to hear
opinions from several groups. Reply-To is tentatively set to
public-powderwg@w3.org, but post as you see appropriate (I guess
anti-spam measures could make this nasty...)

I intend to support POWDER content labels on my.opera.com, since we live
with people posting nudes and stuff. Censorship is a touchy issue.
However, rigid taxonomies have never been popular among users, tags are
however, so I intend that people tag their stuff, and then map that tag

Syndicate content