Seems a shame, since this is one of the ways of improving RDF-OWL
interop and mutual intelligibility, without really causing problems
(beyond a few extra triples) to either.

Dan

On 01/06/07, John Breslin wrote:
>
> Dear all -
>
> We have a proposal from one of the SIOC submission partners (CTIC) to
> "delete rdfs:Class and rdf:Property definitions, and
> leaving only owl:Class and owl:[Object|Data]Property".
>
> It'd be good to hear your opinions...
>
> Thanks!
>
> John.
>
> --
> Dr. John Breslin
> DERI, NUI Galway
> http://sw.deri.org/~jbreslin/
> john.breslin@deri.org
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SIOC-Dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to sioc-dev@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sioc-dev-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sioc-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---