sioc:link may not be a Literal
2006, May 30 - 09:46 — Christoph Görn
Hello,
as discovered by ldodds while debugging some stuff with me http://
rdfs.org/sioc/ns#link must not be in range of a Literal but a Resource.
Christoph
--
blogging at: http://B4mad.Net/datenbrei
info at: http://B4mad.Net/datenbrei/index.php?author=2/foaf.rdf
gpg key: http://pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de:11371/pks/lookup?
op=get&search=0xB10DFF8D88FD746C
x509 root ca certificate: http://b4mad.net/CA/
- Login to post comments
This resource is supported by Science Foundation Ireland under grant number SFI/02/CE1/I131 (Líon) and SFI/08/CE/I1380 (Líon 2) at the Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of Ireland, Galway.
Syndicate
sioc:link may not be a Literal
Correct, thanks! :)
Similarly the range of sioc:links_to also should be rdfs:Resource, not
Literal.
Fixed in the repository: http://sw.deri.org/svn/sw/2005/08/sioc/ns/sioc
Also fixed: wrong namespace for DeprecatedProperty and RDF validation
errors
I will soon publish the new version of the ontology in rdfs.org.
If you have more comments and corrections, keep them coming.
P.S. At the moment the development version of SIOC ontology is
available via the repository link above. The SIOC website contains an
older - stable ontology version.
Best,
Uldis
[ http://captsolo.net/info/ ]
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SIOC-Dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to sioc-dev@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sioc-dev-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sioc-dev
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
sioc:link may not be a Literal
hello, as expected that fixed the problems. So what I now have is a
"SIOC Exporter for foafroll files", please see
my blog entry mentioned earlier and the attached Converter.java...
Christoph