how to describe a whole Community?

Hello all,
I've been playing with different SIOC things and have a question
how a Community is defined? SIOC assumes that a Site hosts different
Forums , which may be derived from blogs or mailingslists. All that
is held in a RDF store. From my understanding, a linkage (which
defines two or more sources of SIOC data as "the same Community")
between a Google mailinglist and a blog is missing. How could that be
linked up?

Using a rdf:Collection like in http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/
#example17 still needs to type the Collection, requiring a
sioc:Community.

Any other ideas for linkage of SIOC source to form a community?

Christoph
--
Christoph Görn
http://B4mad.Net/FOAF/goern.rdf#goern

Usability schmusability... where's the part where we talk about how
this helps users kick ass?

how to describe a whole Community?

Hi Christopher -

That is a very good question - and it brings up the notion of a
distributed community.

Perhaps we need a notion of sioc:Community as you've described. A
sioc:Forum can have sioc:Posts that span sites, but what if there is a
sioc:Site that isn't just on one site or location but is in multiple
places. Perhaps the sioc:Site is the wrong term, and should actually be
a Community...

At the moment, all we could do would be use sioc:links_to to create a
linkage between two forums, but this would not express the fact that the
Forums form part of a single community.

An example is the SIOC mailing list on Google Groups and the forums at
rdfs.org - how do we say these are the same community?

Talk soon,

John.
--
Christoph Görn wrote:
> Hello all,
> I've been playing with different SIOC things and have a question how
> a Community is defined? SIOC assumes that a Site hosts different
> Forums , which may be derived from blogs or mailingslists. All that is
> held in a RDF store. From my understanding, a linkage (which defines
> two or more sources of SIOC data as "the same Community") between a
> Google mailinglist and a blog is missing. How could that be linked up?
>
> Using a rdf:Collection like in
> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/#example17 still needs to type the
> Collection, requiring a sioc:Community.
>
> Any other ideas for linkage of SIOC source to form a community?
>
> Christoph
> --Christoph Görn
> http://B4mad.Net/FOAF/goern.rdf#goern
>
> Usability schmusability... where's the part where we talk about how
> this helps users kick ass?
>
>

--
Dr. John Breslin
DERI, NUI Galway
http://sw.deri.org/~jbreslin/
john.breslin@deri.org

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SIOC-Dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to sioc-dev@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sioc-dev-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sioc-dev
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

how to describe a whole Community?

Am 19.05.2006 um 12:46 schrieb John Breslin:
> Perhaps we need a notion of sioc:Community as you've described. A
> sioc:Forum can have sioc:Posts that span sites, but what if there is a
> sioc:Site that isn't just on one site or location but is in multiple
> places. Perhaps the sioc:Site is the wrong term, and should
> actually be
> a Community...

Hmm, reading the SIOC paper section 4.2 by A.Harth, yourself et al a
Site may
provide SIOC data, if so, different Sites may be integrated in a
network of
community sites. I think sioc:Community is simply missing :)

> At the moment, all we could do would be use sioc:links_to to create a
> linkage between two forums, but this would not express the fact
> that the
> Forums form part of a single community.

Right, that's not the same, in addition: I cant see a sico:links_to
on http://rdfs.org/sioc/ns#

Christoph

--
Christoph Görn
http://B4mad.Net/FOAF/goern.rdf#goern

Usability schmusability... where's the part where we talk about how
this helps users kick ass?