<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rdf:RDF
      xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
      xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
      xmlns:sioc="http://rdfs.org/sioc/ns#"
      xmlns:sioct="http://rdfs.org/sioc/types#"
      xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
      xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
      xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
      xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/">
<foaf:Document rdf:about=''>
  <dc:title>SIOC profile for 'sioc-project.org'</dc:title>
  <dc:description>A SIOC profile describes the structure and contents of a community site (e.g., weblog) in a machine processable form. For more information refer to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://rdfs.org/sioc&quot;&gt;SIOC project page&lt;/a&gt;</dc:description>
  <foaf:primaryTopic rdf:resource="http://sioc-project.org/node/313"/>
  <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://drupal.org/project/sioc"/>
</foaf:Document>
<sioc:Post rdf:about="http://sioc-project.org/node/313">
  <dc:title>URIs in SIOC</dc:title>
  <sioc:content>Hi,
first I have to apologize if this posting floods your inbox; there
seem to be problems with google groups and I keep getting error
messages about not being allowed to post here... Seems I lost control of
what gets posted and how often.
My question is about the use of URIs in SIOC:
In the few examples on your project homepage and in the sioc-files
floating around in the wild it seems that there is a common (and, as
far as this mailing list goes, undisputed) practice of using document-
URIs for non-document resources. sioc:user, for example, is almost
always identified as some HTML-document, same for sioc:site and,
sometimes, sioc:container/sioc:forum.
Is this by design? Is sioc:user something like a hidden
sioc:userHomepage, the way FOAF uses a workplaceHomepage rather than a
URI for the company I work at? If so, wouldn&#039;t this break the concept
of sioc:user being a sub-property of foaf:Account?
In other words: If I use a non-document URI for a sioc:user or a
sioc:forum (which a thought would be more elegant), do I break things
or is it just a matter of preference?
Thank you for your support,
Oskar
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &quot;SIOC-Dev&quot; group.
To post to this group, send email to sioc-dev@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sioc-dev-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sioc-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
</sioc:content>
  <dcterms:created>2007-08-27T09:12:23+01:00</dcterms:created>
  <dcterms:modified>2007-12-12T10:57:09+00:00</dcterms:modified>
  <sioc:link rdf:resource="http://sioc-project.org/node/313" rdfs:label="URIs in SIOC" />
  <sioc:topic rdf:resource="http://sioc-project.org/taxonomy/term/13" rdfs:label="Developers" />
  <sioc:has_creator rdf:resource="http://sioc-project.org/sioc/user/927%2523user" rdfs:seeAlso="http://sioc-project.org/sioc/user/927" />
</sioc:Post>
</rdf:RDF>