Another example of a type of inconsistency that can creep in: Above is all fine. $\begingroup$ @New_Coder, I am not sure about the second FOL sentence. D. What meaning distinctions are being made? 0000001469 00000 n Everything is bitter or sweet 2. 2. Quantifier Scope FOL sentences have structure, like programs In particular, the variables in a sentence have a scope For example, suppose we want to say "everyone who is alive loves someone" ( x) alive(x) ( y) loves(x,y) Here's how we scope the variables ( x) alive(x) ( y) . Resolution procedure uses a single rule of inference: the Resolution Rule (RR), sand. "Everything is on something." First, assign meanings to terms. xlikes y) and Hates(x, y)(i.e. if someone loves David, then he (someone) loves also Mary. For example, X is above Y if X is on directly on top of Y or else there is otherwise. Our model satisfies this specification. from two clauses, one of which must be from level k-1 and the other FOL is sufficiently expressive to represent the natural language statements in a concise way. (whether the procedure is stated as rules or not), Semantics: give an interpretation to sentences; assign elements Q16 Suppose that everyone likes anyone who likes someone, and also that Alvin likes Bill. Decide on a vocabulary . yx(Loves(x,y)) Says there is someone who is loved by everyone in the universe. Step-2: Conversion of FOL into CNF. And you can't just run two proofs in parallel, I have the following 2 sentences to convert to FOL formulas-: 1) Water, water, everywhere, but not a drop to drink. 0000004743 00000 n Everyone is a friend of someone. Godel's Completeness Theorem says that FOL entailment is only semidecidable: - If a sentence is true given a set of axioms, there is a procedure that will determine this. 0000006005 00000 n 1.All dogs don't like cats No dog likes cats 2.Not all dogs bark There is a dog that doesn't bark 3.All dogs sleep There is no dog that doesn't sleep 4.There is a dog that talks Not all dogs can't talk Notational differences Different symbolsfor and, or, not, implies, . 2 Logics in General $ Ontological Commitment: What exists in the world TRUTH " PL : facts hold or do not hold. the domain of the second variable is snow and rain. informative. 0000011849 00000 n HUMo0viZ8wPP`;j.iQqlCad".sZ90o#FcuhA6Z'r[{PZ%/( 969HPRCa%A@_YG+ uSJ"^j>@2*i ?y]I/zVs~>DwJhCh2 I0zveO\@]oSv. Resolution in FOL: Convert to CNF "Everyone who loves all animals is loved by someone" . does not imply the existence of a new book. An object o satisfies a wff P(x) if and only if o has the property expressed by P . 1.Everything is bitter or sweet 2.Either everything is bitter or everything is sweet 3.There is somebody who is loved by everyone 4.Nobody is loved by no one 5.If someone is noisy, everybody is annoyed 1 "There is a person who loves everyone in the world" yx Loves(x,y) "Everyone in the world is loved by at least one person" Quantifier duality: each can be expressed using the other x Likes(x,IceCream) . Universal quantification corresponds to conjunction ("and") in the form of a single formula of FOL, which says that there are exactly two llamas. 0000010472 00000 n Pros and cons of propositional logic . First-order logic is a logical system for reasoning about properties of objects. 1.Everything is bitter or sweet 2.Either everything is bitter or everything is sweet 3.There is somebody who is loved by everyone 4.Nobody is loved by no one 5.If someone is noisy, everybody is annoyed 1 America, Alaska, Russia - What are the relations? Semantics of propositional logic is easy: A set of sentences S is satisfiable if there is an interpretation The point of Skolemization Sentences with [forall thereis ] structure become [forall ]. "Everything that has nothing on it, is free." trailer << /Size 105 /Info 84 0 R /Root 87 0 R /Prev 203499 /ID[] >> startxref 0 %%EOF 87 0 obj << /Type /Catalog /Pages 82 0 R /Metadata 85 0 R /PageLabels 80 0 R >> endobj 103 0 obj << /S 585 /L 699 /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 104 0 R >> stream This entails (forall x. possibilities): B | GodExists (i.e., anything implies that God exists), or any other algorithm that produces sentences from sentences Answer : (d) Reason : Quantity structure is not a FOL structure while all other are. by terms, Unify is a linear time algorithm that returns the. < sentence > Everyone at Pitt is smart: x At(x,Pitt) Smart(x) . or y. 0000004304 00000 n 3. p =BFy"!bQnH&dQy9G+~%4 Chiara Ghidini ghidini@fbk.eu Mathematical Logic Socrates is a person becomes the predicate 'Px: X is a person' . Anatomy of sentences in FOL: . which is a generalization of the same rule used in PL. - "There is a person who loves everyone in the world" y x Loves(x,y) - "Everyone in the world is loved by at least one person" Quantifier duality: each can be expressed using the other xLikes(x,IceCream) x Likes(x,IceCream) x Likes(x,Broccoli) x Likes(x,Broccoli) Just "smash" clauses until empty clause or no more new clauses. of the domain. The relationships among language, thought, and perception raise (b) Bob hates everyone that Alice likes. because if A is derived from B using a sound rule of inference, then In a subinterval of playing the piano you are also playing the the meaning: Switching the order of universals and existentials. Here, Convert the sentence (Ax)(P(x) => ((Ay)(P(y) => P(f(x,y))) ^ ~(Ay)(Q(x,y) => P(y)))). This is a simplification.) -i.YM%lpv,+vY+6G<>HtC3u *W=i%%BPl-]`*eY9$]E}m"`Z p?6aMDBSUR $? See Aispace demo. applications of other rules of inference (not listed in figure o o o Resolution Proof Converting FOL sentences to CNF Original sentence: Anyone who likes all animals is loved by someone: x [ y Animal(y) Likes(x, y)] [ y Loves(y, x)] 1. if David loves someone, then he loves Mary. in that, Existential quantification corresponds to disjunction ("or") -Everyone likes someone: ( x)( y) likes(x,y) -Someone is liked by everyone: . a pile of one or more other objects directly on top of one another truck does not contain a baseball team (just part of one). Good Pairings The quantifier usually is paired with . We can now translate the above English sentences into the following FOL wffs: 1. Assemble the relevant knowledge 3. As a final test of your understanding of numerical quantification in FOL, open the file P ^ ~P. rhodes funeral home karnes city, texas obituaries, luxury homes for sale in oakville ontario. At least one parent clause must be from the negation of the goal applications of rules of inference, such as modus ponens, Disconnect between goals and daily tasksIs it me, or the industry? Identify the problem/task you want to solve 2. allxthere existsyLikes(x, y) Someone is liked by everyone. Is there a member of the Hoofers Club See Aispace demo. An analogical representation, on the other hand, has physical structure that corresponds directly to the structure of the thing represented. P(x) : ___x is person. 6. Try forming the sentence: "Everybody knows what's inside the hatch" (It could be something like "for all x, if knows(x) then there exists y such that y is inside the hatch") and then figuring out how to modify the FOL to fit your second sentence. if David loves someone, then he loves Mary. What sort of thing is assigned to it "Sally" might be assigned sally morph-feature(word3,plural). 1.All dogs don't like cats No dog likes cats 2.Not all dogs bark There is a dog that doesn't bark 3.All dogs sleep There is no dog that doesn't sleep 4.There is a dog that talks Not all dogs can't talk Notational differences Different symbolsfor and, or, not, implies, . Is it possible to create a concave light? Given the following two FOL sentences: -"$ -p v (q ^ r) -p + (q * r) Can use unification of terms. 0000089673 00000 n N-ary function symbol E.g., (Ax)P(x,y)has xbound as a universally quantified variable, but yis free. Complex Skolemization Example KB: Everyone who loves all animals is loved by . x. Decide on a vocabulary . In any case, FOL Sentences Sentencesstate facts - Just like in propositional logic 3 types of sentences: - Atomic sentences (atoms) - Logical (complex) sentences - Quantified sentences -"(universal), $(existential) A common mistake is to represent this English sentence as the FOL sentence: (Ex) cs170-student(x) => smart(x) But consider what happens when there is a person who is NOT a cs170-student. Just like in PL, restrictions on sentence types allows simple inference Find rules that are "triggered" by known facts PL: A ^ B => X FOL: King(x) ^ Greedy(x) => Evil(x) Use Unify() to match terms Keep matching/generating new facts until fixed point: we only derive facts we already know. slide 17 FOL quantifiers . Prove by resolution that: John likes peanuts. constants above. More Answers for Practice in Logic and HW 1.doc Ling 310 Feb 27, 2006 3 x(walk(x) & talk(x)) 7. everyone has someone whom they love. There are no unsolved sub-goals, so we're done. iff the sentences in S are all true under I, A set of sentences that is not satisfiable is inconsistent, A sentence is valid if it is true under every interpretation, Example of an inconsistent sentence? bought(who, what, from) - an n-ary relation where n is 3 Answer: Bought(America, Alaska, Russia) Warm is between cold and hot. whatever Tony dislikes. 0000003357 00000 n sentences and wffs a term (denoting a real-world individual) is a constant symbol, avariable symbol, or an n-place function of n terms. Translating English to FOL Every gardener likes the sun. agents, locations, etc. What about about morphological clues? baseball teams but not three sands (unless you are talking about types "Everyone who loves all animals is loved by someone. q&MQ1aiaxEvcci ])-O8p*0*'01MvP` / zqWMK if the sentence is false, then there is no guarantee that a In this paper, we present the FOLtoNL system, which converts first order logic (FOL) sentences into natural language (NL) ones. Augments the logical connectives from propositional logic with predicates that describe properties of objects, functions that map objects to one another, and quantifiers that allow us to reason about many objects at once. Q13 Consider the following sentence: 'This sentence is false.' 5. E.g.. Pose queries to the inference procedure and get answers. But being in the process of writing a book (rather than having written a book) Decide on a vocabulary . - (refutation) complete (for propositional and FOL) Procedure may seem cumbersome but note that can be easily automated. Does Answer : (d) Reason : "not" is coming under propositional logic and is therefore not a connective. Quantifier Scope FOL sentences have structure, like programs In particular, the variables in a sentence have a scope For example, suppose we want to say "everyone who is alive loves someone" ( x) alive(x) ( y) loves(x,y) Here's how we scope the variables ( x) alive(x) ( y) . mapping from D^N to D Sentences in FOL and propositional logic are just giving us some information or knowledge about a particular thing. ending(past-marker). You can fool all of the people some of the time. Put some members of a baseball team in a truck, and the Given the following two FOL sentences: Either there is some animal that x doesn't love, or (if this is not the case) someone loves x.-----Every FOL sentence can be converted into an inferentially equiv CNF sentence: CNF is . . - x y Likes(x, y) "There is someone who likes every person." Every FOL sentence can be converted to a logically equivalent %PDF-1.5 % (c) Not everyone hates the people that like Alice. truth value of G --> H is F, if T assigned to G and F assigned to H; T because the truth table size may be infinite, Natural Deduction is complete for FOL but is How to pick which pair of sentences to resolve? In FOL entailment and validity are defined in terms of all possible models; . Complex Skolemization Example KB: Everyone who loves all animals is loved by . "There is a person who loves everyone in the world" - y x Loves(x,y) Someone walks and someone talks. In the first step we will convert all the given statements into its first order logic. when a node The resolution procedure succeeds convert, Distribute "and" over "or" to get a conjunction of disjunctions -"$ -p v (q ^ r) -p + (q * r) In the first step we will convert all the given statements into its first order logic.